January 29, 2004

Grimestoppers Inc.

Wanted to briefly pick up the great blissed-out one's remarks re:Grime and thanks firstly to Angus who rode out of the swirling outback dust like Mad Max* to rescue me earlier. Reynolds himself has actually reflected in unpublished, behind-the-scenes correspondence** that he doesn't really like the term, and also that: "I wish someone would come up with a really hits-it-on-the-nail undeniable we-can-all-agree-on-this name."

Wiley's really gone to town with this himself. "Wot do you call it?" which I heard him deliver this at Eskimo Dance, and which is on the new LP, has lyrics which go: "What do you call it? Garage? What do you call it? Urban? 2-step?" etc ad nauseam. It's that the archetypal useless musicians cliche turned manifesto isn't it: "Don't categorise me!" Yep that makes me want to call it Garage... not just because it's dopey, but also cos you can't have lone musicians calling the changes. It's just not democratic baby!

Another reason I'm resistant to to Grime (beyond Angus's razor-sharp observations as given) is that "on the ground" you hardly ever hear the music being described thus, (to expand on what I said before) In the shops it's called Sub-Lo, or it's MC Garage, or it's 8-bar. There MC tracks are outnumbered 10 to 1 by Instrumentals. (This for reasons we explored last year. MC-ing mainly exists on the radio and at the dance, and the shops service the DJs who play backing tracks for the MCs.) Maybe the fact that the MC-ing records are still in the minority is a part of the reason the term "Grime" appears to be coming from outside the scene, where it's percieved (via Dizzee) as being an entirely MC-led art-form? Does that make any sense?

I've yet to hear ANY artists who are happy with the term (that's some kind of first surely). Wonder (who did the mighty "What" riddim and was a former member of Roll Deep) has found himself wedged between the FWD beat and "Grime" scene reflects in the RWD mag that: "...it's all just Garage." And, bear with me I'm getting to the BIG point, I think this might be the moment at which these genres stop subdividing.

Let's face Garage is shifting tiny quantities of records. Seems like I'm the only person buying it sometimes (wink) Luka told me the other day that he heard someone on the radio going (along the lines of): "so-and-so said he shifted a thousand records, man that is so not true." That's a joke isn't it! I think we've reached the final point of dance-music's expansion. The universe has already expanded to it's absolutely biggest point (maybe a year or so ago) and now it's contracting. Maybe what we're seeing is genres coalescing. The market share is so frigging small that to start calling such-and-such a genre isn't constructive business sense any more. We've got the insane situation where you have a artist (Wiley) declaring HE is a genre.

Plus whenever I hear someone refer to the music as Grime now, I know, I just KNOW that they've picked it up from a glossy, or a newspaper or the net. Just my opinion mind, and I get these things arse-about-tit pretty often. Anyway if it doesn't stick as a term those might be some reasons why.

* I'll be your Private Dancer bad bwoy...
** It's another Woebot exclusive.

Posted by Woebot at January 29, 2004 04:26 PM
Comments

Maybe the fact that the MC-ing records are still in the minority is a part of the reason the term "Grime" appears to be coming from outside the scene, where it's percieved (via Dizzee) as being an entirely MC-led art-form?

I think what I'm hamfistedly trying to say here is that with one's face pressed against the window looking in Garage appears to be a production line, an array of machines, processes and tools which interlock almost inadvertantly to produce the MC records which we can clearly identify in objets like Dizzee's LP. I haven't witnessed this as strongly in any other dance music, even roots.

The term "Grime" appears to come from outside the scene and refers (with somewhat myopic ease) to the MC record. As a professed outsider I've been harvesting these distinct "objets", doing my natty cd comps for my own pleasure. But the mechanics of the scene are a lot more elaborate. Indeed the scene's own "complete" production of choice is not the record, but the radio show. Like energy god Luke Davis I'm eagerly anticipating the new Box Bloody Fresh DVD and CD.

Posted by: Matt at January 29, 2004 07:14 PM

talking abt garage recently w. friends in light of the 'spate' uk press stories kinda fetches up how much a terrible term grime is: 'have you heard any grime?' 'do you like grime?' &c. it just doesn't fit mouths, fr my money. is the problem i have w. it.

Posted by: david at January 30, 2004 02:58 AM

from the Urban Dictionary

thanks to "king shit" for the entry:

grime
a slimey layer of sweat, dirt, feces particles, pubic hair, and god knows what else, that builds up on the nut-sack when not washed
I'd rather lick the grime off my dad's nutsack than clean up after you.

Posted by: Peter M at January 30, 2004 03:55 AM

cozen
i completely agree about the word in the mouth. doesnt roll. if there was one that sounded good i'd probably leap on it, and quit whingeing. "eski" fr'instance is just rubbish.

Posted by: Matt at January 30, 2004 07:28 AM

Howzabout we just go back to calling it jungle? I liked jungle so much better than dreary drum 'n' bass (that sinking feeling you got when putting on the first Grooverider album or the first Peshay album, for instance, and lo, there's the wind machine, and lo, there be the Herbie Hancock Fender Rhodes).

Now if you'll excuse me I must light up my David Jacobs-style alabaster meerschaum pipe and reminisce about those gay old refrains from those Origin Unknown and Leviticus chappies - oh how splendid, I did enjoy that, as I said to darling Hubert Gregg outside the Blue Note in 1993 etccczzzzzz.

Posted by: Marcello Carlin at January 30, 2004 08:26 AM

i don't like the term because like cozen i feel ridiculous saying it. the word gets used a lot by the insiders but not usually to signify a genre. it's used in the same way as 'dark' used to be used in jungle days, as an adjective. we'll get grimy later, now it's ladys time, that sort of thing

Posted by: luke at January 30, 2004 09:19 AM

This is the sort of argument that ends with you waking up in the middle of the night in a coldsweat wondering if you should alphabetize your CD collection by title or artist name.

And Marcello -- it wasn't drum 'n' bass so much as intelligent drum 'n' bass that made a fellow wonder if he shouldn't cut the crusts off his toast before settling back and spinning the latest LTJ Bukem platters....

Posted by: lord marmite at January 31, 2004 06:11 AM

I think you'll find it's called Rap.

The market size curve for dance music has been "flattening" (read: flatlining) for a couple of years now, with a noticeable reduction in young punters coming through the doors. It's principally a demographic thing, not a piracy thing. (Can't quote numbers -- wasn't able to nick the market reports!)

With a smaller overall market to play with, Matt's right to suggest that the scope for further segmentation and "genre-level" product differentiation isn't really there any more (not sure Kotler would recognise my languaga but we'll let that pass). Instead, producers try to make records that attract a variety of different segments. Hence the slow down in the speed of garage to near hip hop speed, and the focus on hip-hop-style MCing -- and also hence the cross-over of dancehall. It's all about risk reduction.

Grime's failure to translate its popularity into proper product -- i.e. tracks with rapping on them -- is a classic "CHasm" issue. The early market -- DJs -- want instrumentals. The late market -- fans -- want MC cuts. But the risk associated with deviating from the instrumentals-for-DJs market, given the small scale of the overall garage market, means that few producers risk doing MC tracks.

I would presume that post-Dizzee there will be a flood of MC tracks -- Wiley has his album in the can for example. But the lack of airplay and availability of dubplates is a concern. If the market is real, they'll be picking up on the early product samples. It doesn't look to me like they are.

It's possible the grime scene is about to fizzle out and that the albums will arrive six months too late. We need crossover MC tracks now -- but who they'll actually crossover to is a moot point. Personally I see no reason why the teen garage crowd won't go for it, but they need a channel...

Posted by: paul "down with the hood? babes in the wood more like it" meme at February 3, 2004 03:15 PM

it's all about what "it" crosses over into and what it invigorates .

Posted by: yeah yeah at February 20, 2004 01:08 AM